One figure, fully defensible
Measured in the real prices of real things — using CPI's own basket and weights, but swapping the government's imagined-rent housing guess for the actual price of a home.
We keep CPI's own eight-group basket and its own weights — so this is apples-to-apples, not a cherry-pick. We change exactly one thing, in the open:
Housing. CPI fills about a third of its entire index with Owners' Equivalent Rent — a survey asking homeowners to imagine what their home would rent for. We replace that imagined figure with the real sale price of a home. That single transparent swap is the core of the gap.
| Technique | What BLS does | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Owners' Equivalent Rent | Surveys homeowners to imagine a rent | Systematically understates housing inflation. ~34% of CPI is a guess. |
| Substitution | Assumes you switch to cheaper goods when prices rise | Measures a falling standard of living as "stable prices." |
| Hedonic adjustment | Discounts prices for "quality improvements" | A $2,000 laptop "costs less" because it's faster. Your wallet disagrees. |
We don't apply these techniques. We ask the blunter question: how much more does the same thing cost in dollars?
Each bar is a category's real price increase since 1913. Red = rose faster than the government's own overall number (where the pain is). Green = roughly in line or cheaper — where CPI is basically fair, and we say so.
Food has risen roughly in line with the official number, and several goods — electronics, clothing, some appliances — are genuinely cheaper, in dollars and in hours of work. Credibility is the point, so we say so plainly.
The gap is concentrated in housing, healthcare, and college — the things that decide whether a life feels affordable. That's the part the single headline number buries.
We don't hide the parts that cut against us. Browse the full dataset →
1913 (the Fed's founding) is the headline anchor. The second is 1971, when the dollar's last tie to gold was cut — the sound-money story in one comparison: